by timewizard » Thu Mar 12, 2009 10:10 pm
by ruffian4 » Thu Mar 12, 2009 10:52 pm
killmaimburn wrote:If this is a masked ball, then the other bits of him are off spiking the teachers punch.
by killmaimburn » Thu Mar 12, 2009 10:58 pm
ruffian4 wrote:Handy fellow, this kmb...Like Ahriman delving the paths of the webway ...
by LordMalekTheRedKnight » Fri Mar 13, 2009 1:29 am
by timewizard » Fri Mar 13, 2009 1:36 am
by killmaimburn » Fri Mar 13, 2009 7:42 am
by ruffian4 » Fri Mar 13, 2009 8:21 am
LordMalekTheRedKnight wrote:i know King is interested at the idea of running proper AoS-GF tournies, with prize support etc, in the future. for something like that, a proper FAQ is definately needed.
by LordMalekTheRedKnight » Fri Mar 13, 2009 9:48 am
killmaimburn wrote:We could do it the easy way..we cross reference INAT GT FAQ and current GT faqs.. and just overide bits where our personal views differ from the current interpretations of RAW.here we'd just go.. tick tick tick cross "why did you cross that?" "because its insane" "oh alright then.. lets put it to a vote"
ruffian4 wrote:The way I see it, is that we probably don't outright "need" to do it for Aug.But, if we are going to at some point, why not start as early as possible?
by ruffian4 » Fri Mar 13, 2009 10:22 am
by LordMalekTheRedKnight » Fri Mar 13, 2009 10:41 am
by ruffian4 » Fri Mar 13, 2009 10:57 am
killmaimburn wrote:we cross reference INAT GT FAQ and current GT faqs.. and just overide bits where our personal views differ from the current interpretations of RAW.
by Spack » Fri Mar 13, 2009 11:12 am
by LordMalekTheRedKnight » Fri Mar 13, 2009 11:24 am
by timewizard » Fri Mar 13, 2009 12:18 pm
by killmaimburn » Fri Mar 13, 2009 1:08 pm
timewizard wrote:@Tim-good idea using the existing Gt FAQ. I also have a copy of the adepticon FAQ. These would make a good starting point
Return to 40K Rules Development
In association with Gaming Figures
Age of Strife