by Spack » Thu Dec 18, 2008 11:29 pm
by mattjgilbert » Fri Dec 19, 2008 9:49 am
by killmaimburn » Fri Dec 19, 2008 12:37 pm
mattjgilbert wrote:I think our Eldar might be good for the super heavy assassin force.
ruffian4 wrote:Handy fellow, this kmb...Like Ahriman delving the paths of the webway ...
by mattjgilbert » Fri Dec 19, 2008 2:21 pm
by AdrianG » Sun Dec 21, 2008 12:28 am
by Spack » Sun Dec 21, 2008 8:22 am
by killmaimburn » Sun Dec 21, 2008 8:42 am
AdrianG wrote:So is VDR allowed?Having just spotted the post (but not read) in "their" thread.
ruffian4 wrote:Have you guys got anything to say about this...arseface wrote:I'm putting an army together of vrax renegades, from imp armour 6.The artillery strike costs are a little different from the first list.In the first one, you purchased a strike according to which type you wanted.In the second, there is a points cost at the army listing head, followed by the same costs from the first book for each type of strike.Is this a typo, or are you paying "X" points to have a strike, then points for the type.Or "X" x2, 3 or whatever?Also the scatter rules are a bit odd when taken with 5th ed.It doesn't scatter like a barrage, but like ordnance from the view point of a spotter (giving up cover saves, potentially).It is written assuming 1d6 scatter, I presume."If a miss is rolled, the distance scattered is double the score on the d6.If a hit is rolled...deviates by the distance shown on the dice."So, a hit deviates 2d6 - BS (of who exactly?).A miss deviates by 2d6 - bs.The problem here is the rule (I think) is obviously intended for 1d6 scatter, but even with codex overrules book, the rule can still be interpreted as per the rulebook giving what may be an odd result.Any opionions?
arseface wrote:I'm putting an army together of vrax renegades, from imp armour 6.The artillery strike costs are a little different from the first list.In the first one, you purchased a strike according to which type you wanted.In the second, there is a points cost at the army listing head, followed by the same costs from the first book for each type of strike.Is this a typo, or are you paying "X" points to have a strike, then points for the type.Or "X" x2, 3 or whatever?Also the scatter rules are a bit odd when taken with 5th ed.It doesn't scatter like a barrage, but like ordnance from the view point of a spotter (giving up cover saves, potentially).It is written assuming 1d6 scatter, I presume."If a miss is rolled, the distance scattered is double the score on the d6.If a hit is rolled...deviates by the distance shown on the dice."So, a hit deviates 2d6 - BS (of who exactly?).A miss deviates by 2d6 - bs.The problem here is the rule (I think) is obviously intended for 1d6 scatter, but even with codex overrules book, the rule can still be interpreted as per the rulebook giving what may be an odd result.Any opionions?
mattjgilbert wrote:I'm happy for both lists to be used as described.
by ruffian4 » Sun Dec 21, 2008 9:28 am
AdrianG wrote:So is VDR allowed?
killmaimburn wrote:I personally would get very scared of VDR (my evil which I am keeping firmly on a leash would most certainly find a way to eek its way out)
killmaimburn wrote:If this is a masked ball, then the other bits of him are off spiking the teachers punch.
by Spack » Sun Dec 21, 2008 9:39 am
by ruffian4 » Sun Dec 21, 2008 10:01 am
by mattjgilbert » Sun Dec 21, 2008 10:02 am
by AdrianG » Sun Dec 21, 2008 2:26 pm
by BDA » Sun Dec 21, 2008 11:23 pm
by mattjgilbert » Mon Dec 22, 2008 10:44 am
by ruffian4 » Mon Dec 22, 2008 8:12 pm
BDA wrote:if only we had another 4 prism tanks
Return to Events
In association with Gaming Figures
Age of Strife