by Baragash » Sat Jul 14, 2012 12:14 pm
killmaimburn wrote:Wow you were angry straight away with Esteriol? And that led to the whole missiles are GW using you post?
Baragash wrote:So to clarify, Stunty's complaint is that he made an uninformed purchase decision and that's the company's fault and not his. Sorry dude, unless there's more to that story, I've got no sympathy (in the same way I deserve no sympathy for the pain of cleaning up this shitcast mini when I should have returned it - the fault is mine).
Stunty wrote:replace them with mantic models because they were cheaper only to find out mantic models are S**t. I've chucked em all in the bin and uped my spending at GW to try to cleanse myself.
killmaimburn wrote:So you concur that the like for like model range are poor, and only someone illinformed would purchase them from mantic.. Interdasting.
by killmaimburn » Sat Jul 14, 2012 12:41 pm
Baragash wrote:Angry? No. Had an attack of *sigh* same ol same ol? Yes.
Baragash wrote:Would you like to spot the bit where I already covered that in my long post or do you need my help?
Baragash wrote:I find the reproach that Mantic are just copying GW pompous and shortsighted, especially when you consider that many, many companies that have tried to enter the tabletop market with more original concepts have had to close doors shortly after because too few people were willing to invest in something new.
I find the reproach that Mantic are just copying GW pompous and shortsighted, especially when you consider that many, many companies that have tried to enter the tabletop market with more original concepts have had to close doors shortly after because too few people were willing to invest in something new.
ruffian4 wrote:Handy fellow, this kmb...Like Ahriman delving the paths of the webway ...
by estarriol » Sat Jul 14, 2012 1:30 pm
by Baragash » Sat Jul 14, 2012 2:31 pm
killmaimburn wrote:So someone should only ever stand on the shoulders of giants, because nothing new ever grows is the defence.. well at least its about the most positive thing I've heard one of the jilted say about GW.
I only take issue with someone holding Mantic to a standard of "originality" that no other gaming company, including GW, is expected to meet. It is a derivative industry, because everyone is speaking and working from a fairly common set of source material.
killmaimburn wrote:If you could, I read Stunty as not objecting to the aesthetics but the quality
by killmaimburn » Sat Jul 14, 2012 3:18 pm
Baragash wrote:Then you can explain where I said the like-for-like model quality was poor.
by jlong05 » Sat Jul 14, 2012 6:50 pm
by Stunty » Sun Jul 15, 2012 12:26 am
by BANE » Sun Jul 15, 2012 12:48 am
by ruffian4 » Sun Jul 15, 2012 4:02 am
jlong05 wrote:Let's keep it civil in the pubic threads ok?
killmaimburn wrote:If this is a masked ball, then the other bits of him are off spiking the teachers punch.
by Red Devil » Sun Jul 15, 2012 8:03 am
BANE wrote:@ Stunty, I have removed my Sig because I have forgiving you for your crimes against me due to your part in this thread.
by mattjgilbert » Sun Jul 15, 2012 8:15 am
by killmaimburn » Sun Jul 15, 2012 8:31 am
by mattjgilbert » Mon Aug 27, 2012 9:47 am
Return to Mantic Games
In association with Gaming Figures
Age of Strife