by Ultramarune » Wed Aug 03, 2011 1:40 am
by Cain Tiberius » Wed Aug 03, 2011 3:13 am
by killmaimburn » Wed Aug 03, 2011 9:10 am
Ultramarune wrote:I’m a former gamer and current painter.
Ultramarune wrote: I was wondering if anyone here is interested to hear about upcoming contests (nice swag, from what I’ve been told) and any other info about the movie?
Ultramarune wrote:I’m here hoping to hear from fans and haters (say your piece but, please be nice) to find out what you guys thought of the movie and how many of you are interested in seeing more WH40k movies? Which armies would you want to see in a sequel? What was weak and what worked.
ruffian4 wrote:Handy fellow, this kmb...Like Ahriman delving the paths of the webway ...
by Spack » Wed Aug 03, 2011 9:31 am
by Stunty » Wed Aug 03, 2011 10:18 am
by hunter101 » Wed Aug 03, 2011 11:05 am
by Cain Tiberius » Wed Aug 03, 2011 8:14 pm
by KInG » Thu Aug 04, 2011 12:19 am
by Ultramarune » Thu Aug 04, 2011 1:38 am
by Ultramarune » Thu Aug 04, 2011 1:55 am
I am sure you'll understand if we are unsure if you're for real, or yanking some chain. But I am going to give you the benifit of the doubt.
Being a Blood Angel through and through, I'd like to see one about the Blood Angel chapter pretty please.
I think the DvD was way over priced, and would have sold alot more if the price was lower. OR, Keep the special edition at that price and release a cheaper regular version.
As for the story, I felt there some fluff inacuracies.
by Ultramarune » Thu Aug 04, 2011 2:06 am
I'm confused by the parameters of your question as someone working (in promotions?)for a company transferring media content formats why would you have any input on the script,plot and direction? (rather than asking you to take a photo of yourself in the sound studio with a shoe on your head I shall just ignore all my doubts about your credibility)
Future-if it made money and could be done better- I'd like a deeper richer film
by Ultramarune » Thu Aug 04, 2011 2:14 am
Spack wrote:I haven't actually watched it all the way through;
Spack wrote:it didn't fit the estabilished background, or the game itself (which is basically non-stop close quarter firefights!).
Spack wrote:Unfortunately I think a non-Marines movie wouldn't be on the cards, even though the Black Library books tend to be better when they're not about Marines (Eisenhorn, Ravenor, and some of the IG ones), as the Marines are the backbone of GW sales.
by Ultramarune » Thu Aug 04, 2011 2:18 am
hunter101 wrote:I enjoyd the film exept for one HUGE POINT! Power Armor is supowst to be hard and quite resiliant. So why make them like paper in t film. Naw marines look like puffs on film. NOT Good. Why GW alowd that weeknes to be portraid in it is beond me.Yes get some painting up and show your steal!
by Ultramarune » Thu Aug 04, 2011 2:23 am
Cain Tiberius wrote:To be honest, the graphics didn't bug me greatly. But then, I haven't played DoW2 as my PC won't handle it. So I haven't been spoilt by it I guess. But thinking about it now, I can agree with what KMB and Spack said about the graphics. They could have been better, more on a par with Advent's Children or Spirits Within.I'd watch a non SM movie, but I'd prefer it to be SM. Actually I haven't seen Damnatus, would like to some day.
by Ultramarune » Thu Aug 04, 2011 2:26 am
KInG wrote:I was disappointed with the storyline. I was expecting some epic tale spanning numerous systems throughout the universe, massive battles as told in the imperial armour books I've read, like varaks1,2,3 I think they were called, and wanted to see a full chapter at work. Instead we got one tactical squad of 10 men in a bit of a clandestine operation. Very low key and small time!Graphics need to be improved also. I've seen better work on PC games from years ago. I bought the collectors edition. Unless reviews for the next one weren't better I wouldn't buy another.
Return to New members
In association with Gaming Figures
Age of Strife