Login

Username:


Password:


Remember me



Forgot Password?




 Merchandise




Codex Tyranids : Tyrant Guard, weapon options?

Discussion of rules in Warhammer 40K - use for existing rules only, for discussing new rules or changes/alternatives use the Rules Development forum

Moderator: mattjgilbert

Codex Tyranids : Tyrant Guard, weapon options?

Postby mortiferum » Fri Sep 04, 2009 8:45 am

First came across this on WarSeer, can each Tyrant Guard in the unit be armed differently, forming a mutiple wound, complex unit?

If I look at and compare Warrior / Ravener broods it specifically states each individual, if I look at Genestealers / Gaunt / Hormagaunts it specifically states whole unit armed identically. Tyrant Guard don't appear to have either of these clarifying points.
User avatar
mortiferum
Justicar
Justicar
 
Posts: 320
Joined: Thu Oct 04, 2007 12:00 am
Location: UK, Oxfordshire

Re: Codex Tyranids : Tyrant Guard, weapon options?

Postby Spack » Fri Sep 04, 2009 10:31 am

It's a point of contention on the AB site in the bug tracker too. Not sure which way it'll swing.
User avatar
Spack
I R Ginger
Field Marshall
 
Posts: 6757
Joined: Sat Feb 12, 2005 12:00 am
Location: Birmingham, UK
Medals: 2
Bronze (1) Painting Entrant (1)
Blog: View Blog (29)

Re: Codex Tyranids : Tyrant Guard, weapon options?

Postby Angelwing » Fri Sep 04, 2009 11:13 am

The way I read it, is that they must all be equipped the same.
I do concede that it could be taken to say otherwise. Now, question is, would you feel a bit dirty doing it for wound allocation abuse?
User avatar
Angelwing
Zoanthrope
Zoanthrope
 
Posts: 2311
Joined: Thu Sep 20, 2007 12:00 am
Location: Bridgwater, Somerset
Medals: 17
Gold (5) Silver (1) Painting Entrant (11)

Re: Codex Tyranids : Tyrant Guard, weapon options?

Postby Myrmidon21 » Fri Sep 04, 2009 12:02 pm

As a long time Nids player, I'm firmly on the side of 'must all be equipped identically' side of the argument for Tyrant Guard. As Anglewing clearly put it, it *IS* 'wound allocation abuse' in its simplest form. Just because GW screwed the pooch rules wise for the multi-wound Ork bikers doesn't mean everyone else should be a bunch of tools who are eager to jump all over the same sort of abusive rules. It's one thing to use skill and a bit of 'dice luck' to outplay your opponent on the table top, it's entirely another to hunt for poorly constructed rules logic in order to obtain an undue advantage. The former game play style leads to games that are fun for both players and doesn't leave the loser feeling as if they were inevitably going to lose due to insurmountable odds from p*ss poor game mechanics. The later style does leave opponents with a bad taste in their mouths, and in the end drives otherwise good players away from the hobby. 'Variable weapons' isn't an option that anyone can honestly argue adds anything of value to the T.G. in terms of effectiveness as a hand-to-hand combat unit. It's simply offered up as a disingenuous way of trying to make it even more difficult to kill T.G. than it already is - which is already difficult enough as is since they're high toughness AND can't be insta-killed.

I like winning a game of 40K as much as the next guy, but doing so by rooting out the most under-costed units (Anyone else remember how hated Gav's Eldar WraithLords were in 3rd Edition due to their unbalanced rules?), or by seeking out the most unbalanced rules conditions and seeking to twist them to my advantage at every turn isn't going to make me the more skillful player or even one that has any gaming opponents who are fun to game with when all is said and done.
"Conan, what is best in life?"
"To paint your miniatures, to see them driven before you on the table, and to hear the lamentation of the cheese-mongers!"

- Del Webb
User avatar
Myrmidon21
Newbie
 
Posts: 8
Joined: Sat Feb 18, 2006 12:00 am




Return to 40K Rules




 Social Links